No More Learning

D.
with the title De Temporum Intervallis, with Scho 560, as in fact Eustratius himself says in almost as
lia of Athanasius and others. The last edition is many words. His work was first edited by L.
that by Zachariae. (Ai 'Putal, oder die Schrift über Allatius in his de Occidentalium atque Orientalium
die Zeitabschnitte, 8vo. Heid. 1836. ) The work is perpetua in Dogmate Purgatorü consensione, Rom.
commonly attributed to Eustathius, Antecessor 1655, 8vo. , pp. 319-581. The style of Eustratius,
Constantinopolitanus. If this inscription be cor- as Photius remarks, is clear, though very different
rect, the Professor must have been of earlier date from classic Greek, and his arguments are generally
than Eustathins Romanus, for the treatise De Tem-sound. (Fabric. Bibl. Graec. vol. x. p. 725; Cave,
porum Intervallis appears to have been originally Hist. Lit. vol. i. p. 416. ) Some other persons of the
compiled in the seventh century. The edition of name of Eustratius are enumerated by Fabricius.
Schardius gives the work nearly in its original (Bibl. Graec. vol. iii. p. 264, note. ) (L. S. ]
form; Cujas, Leunclavius, and Zachariae present us EUSTRATIUS (Evorpátios), one of the latest
with a second edition of the same work as revised commentators on Aristotle, lived about the be-
about the eleventh century by some editor, who has ginning of the twelfth century after Christ, under
added scholia of his own, and introduced references the emperor Alexius Comnenus, as metropolitan of
to the Basilica (Biener, Gesch. der Novellen, p. 124. ) Nicaea. According to a hint in the Commentary
Nessel (cited by Sammet. Diss. de Hypobolo in to the tenth book of the Ethica Nicomachea (if this
Meerm. Thes. Suppl. p. 382) attributes, not to Eus- part of the Commentary is composed by him), he
tathius Romanus, but to the earlier professor Eus appears to have also lived at Constantinople, and
tathius, a synopsis of juridical actions, entitled Ai to bave written his commentary in this place.
dywral év ouvójeh, which is found appended in ma- (Comp. ad Arist. Eth. Nic. x. 9. & 13, p. 472, ed.
nuscript to the Procheiron auctum. (Zachariae, Hist. Zell. ) Of his life we know nothing else. Of his
Jur. Gr. Rom. Delin. § 48 ; Heimbach, de Basil. writings only two are extant, and these in a very
Orig. p. 144. )
fragmentary state : viz ). A Commentary to the
3. An Edict of the Eustathius who was Pr. Pr. second book of the Analytica, published by Aldus
Orientis under Anastasius in A. D. 506, is publish- Manutius, Venice, 1534, and translated into Latin
ed by Zachariae (Anecdota, p. 270). (J. T. G. ] by A. Gratarolus. (Venice, 1542, 1568, fol. )


## p. 123 (#139) ############################################

TRATTUS.
123
EUTHALIUS.
EUTHYDEMUS.
Evordhos), a Greek porica
le fourth century after class
ters of SL Basil are addressed
Epist. 151, 189, ed. Bered)
led by the title " Arcban.
tters is by some personas es
of Nyssa, and is accurate
hird volume of bis was
(W. AG]
LAUDIUS, secretary lo
wrote the lives of Dixda
ulius, Galerius and le
1 a separate book. (Tom
(W. R. )
STÓxios), Cappare:
emperor Constas. El
e of that emperor sadi
of Cappadocia and other
TÓxios; Steph. Brzus
[LS]
byros), a preciza
cquainted with the pain
, and attended in
le arranged the Fado
1 Plot. in Plot Open
1 (W. AG]
205), a presbyter
tinople, is the start
of the Hamas Son
int Resperting bis
be lired, potting i
gathered from the
ist those who mi
act and operate
2. A Commentary to Aristotle's Ellica Nicomachea, | Erasmus, in his several editions of the New Testa-
published in the Greek language with some other ment, incorporated the Argumenta to the Epistles
commentators on the same work, Venice, 1536, fol. , of St. Paul and the Acts. The Prologue on the
and in the Latin language by J. Bernardus Felici- Life of St. Paul, with a prefatory Epistle, was first
anus, Ven. 1641, 1589, fol. , Paris. 1543, Helmst. edited by J. H. Boeclerus at the end of his edition of
1662, 4to. But, according to the latest researches, the New Testament, Argentorat 1645 and 1660,
this commentary consists of very different mate | 12mo. , from which it was afterwards often re-
rials, and great parts of it are the work of other printed. All the works of Euthalius were edited
interpreters, as Aspasius and Michael Ephesius. by L. Zaccagni, in his Collectanea monum. vet.
This has been proved chiefly by the researches of Eccles. Graecac, Rome, 1698, 4to. Whether Eu-
Schleiermacher, in his writings on the Greek thalius also wrote a commentary on the Gospel of
Scholia to the Ethics of Aristotle (printed in the St. Luke and on the Acts, is uncertain, at least
Abhandlungen der Berliner Akademie der Wissensch. there is no distinct mention of them, and no MSS.
of the year 1816—1817, p. 263, &c. ). Schleier- are known to exist. (Fabric. Bibl. Graec. vol. ix. p.
macher has shewn that the author of the commen. 287, &c. ; Cave, Hist. Lit. vol. i. p. 252. ) (L. S. ]
tary to the first book of the Ethics cannot possibly EU'THIAS (Evdías), an Athenian orutor of the
be the same person as the author of the com- time of Demosthenes. He brought an accusation
mentary to the sixth book, because very different against Phryne, and as he failed in his attempt to
interpretations of the 'Etwtepikol Abyou of Aristotle bring about her condemnation, he abstained ever
are given in the two passages cited. (See Stahr, after from speaking in the courts of justice. (Athen.
Aristotelia, ï. pp. 261, 262; Schleiermacher, p. xiii. p. 590 ; Alciphr. Epist. i. 10, &c. ; Suidas. 8. v.
267. ) Probably Eustratius is only the author of Evolas; Schol
. ad Hermog. p. 45. ) (L. S. )
the commentary to the sixth book, which is much EUTHYCLES (EjOukins). 1. An Athenian
better than the rest, and from which the commen- comic poet of the old comedy, whose plays "AOWTO!
taries to the second, third, and fourth book greatly 'ETIOTOK and 'Atanávrh are mentioned by
differ. But perhaps the commentary to the first Suidas (s. v. Ejdukañs and Boüs €680mos), and the
is also to be ascribed to Eustratius, and the dif- former is quoted by Athenaeus (iii. p. 124, c. ).
ference on the signification of the 'Etwtepikol Adyou Nothing more is known of him. (Meineke, Fray.
may hare been occasioned by Eustratius himself | Com. Graec. vol. i. pp. 270, 271, vol. ii. p. 890 ;
borrowing one opinion or the other from more Fabric. Bibl. Graec. vol. ii. p. 448. )
ancient interpreters.
2. Of Rhegium, a Pythagorean philosopher.
The commentaries of Eustratius greatly differ (Iamblich. Vit. Pyth. cc. 27, 36. ) [P. S.
]
from similar works of elder commentators by their EUTHY'CRATES (Ejdukpárns), a Greek
not being uninterrupted treatises on philosophical statuary, whom Pliny places at OL 120, B. C. 300.
subjects, but commentaries in the proper sense of(xxxiv. 8. s. 19. ) He was the most distinguished
the word, explaining single words and things. It son and pupil of Lysippus, whom he imitated more
is this which renders them of great importance. in his diligence than in his gracefulness, preferring
In the middle ages Robert of Lincoln translated severe truth to elegance of expression. (Plin. l. c.
this commentary into Latin, and Albertus Magnus $ 7. ) This feature of his style was seen in a most
and St. Thomas Aquinas made considerable use of excellent statue of Hercules, at Delphi, and in his
it in their interpretation of Aristotle. (Fabric. statues of Alexander, the hunter Thestis, and the
Bibl. Graec. vol. iii. pp. 215, 264; Buhle's Aris Thestiadae : the rest of the passage, in which Pliny
totle, vol. i. p. 299. )
(A. S. ) enumerates his works, is hopelessly corrupt. (See
EUTEʻLIDAS, statuary. (CHRYSOTHEMIS. ) Sillig, Catal. Artif. s. o. ) According to Tatian,
EUTEʼLIDAS ( Eurexidas), a Lacedaemonian Euthycrates made statues of courtezans. Orat.
who gained a prize at Olympia in wrestling and in in Graec. 52. p. 114, ed. Worth. ) [P. S. ]
the pentathlon of boys, in B. C. 628 (OL 38), which EUTHYDE'MUS(Ejdúonuos), an Athenian com-
was the first Olympiad in which the pentathlon, mander in the Peloponnesian war, was, at the close
and the second in which wrestling was performed of its eighteenth year, B. c. 414, raised from a par-
by boys. (Paus. v. 9. § 1, vi. 15, 4, &c. ) (LS. ) ticular to a general command in the army besieging
EUTERPE. [Musa E. ]
Syracuse. The object was to meet the urgent
EUTHAʼLIUS (Eveários), bishop of Sulce, entreaty of Nicias for immediate relief from the
lived, according to some, at the time of the great burden of the sole superintendence, without mak-
Athanasius; and Cave, in the London edition of ing him wait for the arrival of the second arma-
his Hist. Lit. , places him in a. D. 398, whereas, in ment. This position he appears to have occu-
the Basle edition (i. p. 466), he places him about pied to the end, though probably subordinate as
A. D. 458. The latter supposition agrees with a well to Demosthenes and Eurymedon as to Nicias.
statement of Euthalius himself, in bis Introduction Whether he as well as his colleague Menander
to the Life of St. Paul. When Euthalius was yet took part in the night attack on Epipolae appears
a young man, he divided the Epistles of St. Paul doubtful. He is expressly named by Thucydides
into chapters and verses; and after his elevation only once again, as united, in the last desperate
to the bishopric, he did the same with the Acts of engagement in the harbour, with Demosthenes and
the Apostles and the Catholic Epistles. The Epis- Menander in command of the ships. Diodorus
tles of St. Paul, however, bad been divided in that names him in the previous sea-fight, as opposed on
manner before him, about A. D. 396 ; but Euthalius the left wing to the Syracusan Sicanus. Plutarch,
added the argumenta of the chapters, indexes, and who mentions his appointment with Menander,
the passages of Scripture to which allusions are ascribes the occurrence of the second sea-fight, in
made in the Epistles. This work he afterwards which the Athenians received their first defeat, to
sent to Athanasius the younger, who was bishop the eagerness of the two new commanders to dis-
of Alexandria in A. D. 490. A portion of it was play their abilities. But this looks very like a late
first published by cardinal Ximenes, in 1514. conjecture, such as Ephorus was fond of making,
an body. Phata
3, and made eze
of that Enstrauss
Further, as Els
orks of Dicarea
ter the publicaties
have been carri-
efore very good
ne of Eutyches,
is, about 2
ays in alpst 4
t edited by L
Esi, Ra
e of Eustradas
very di test
s are generato
2725; Care,
persons of the
by Fabricas
(LS. )
of the lates
out the bed
rist oder
гороlісу а
Anne:27
ta (is
him be
Tople, బడి
473 et


## p. 124 (#140) ############################################

! 24
EUTHYDEMUS.
EUTHYMIUS.
riren
EVOVAHM
BAEJAEDE
and is further inconsistent with the language of Ariana, p. 221. ) Silver coins of this prince, of
Thucydides, who represents the Syracusans as act- Greek style of workmanship and bearing Greek
ing on the offensive, and shews in Nicias's letter inscriptions, have been found in considerable num-
that they had it in their power to force an engage- bers at Bokhara, Balkh, and other places within
ment. Of his ultimate fate we are ignorant: his the limits of Bactria, thus attesting the extent to
name (it is probably his) occurs as far back as the which Greek civilization had been introduced into
cighteenth year of the war, B. c. 422, among the those remote regions. (Ibid. p. 222. ) [E. H. B. )
signatures to the Lacedaemonan treaties. (Thuc.
v. 19, 24, vii. 16, 69; Diod. xiii. 13; Plut. Ni-
oias, c. 20. )
[A. H. C. ]
EUTHÝDE'MUS (EjO'S nuos). 1. A sophist,
was born at Chios, and migrated with his brother
Dionysodorus to Thurii in Italy. Being exiled
thence, they came to Athens, where they resided
many years. The pretensions of Euthydemus and
his brother are exposed by Plato in the dialogue
which bears the name of the former. A sophism
of Euthydemus, as illustrating the “ fallacy of
composition,” is mentioned by Aristotle. (Plat.
COIN OF EUTHYDEM US.
Euthydemus, Cratyl. p. 386 ; Arist. Rhet. ii. 24,
$ 3, Soph. El. 20; Ath. xi. p. 506, b; Sext. Emp. EUTHY'MANES, or more correctly EUTHY'.
adv. Math. vii. 13. )
MENES (Ejdujévms), of Massilia, is referred to
2. Son of Cephalus of Syracuse, and brother to several times as the author of a geographical work,
Lysias the orator. (Plat. Rep. i. p. 328 ; see vol. i. the real nature of which, however, is unknown.
p. 668, a. )
(Plut. de Plac. Philos. 4; Athen. ii. c. 90; Lydus
3. Son of Diocles, and a disciple of Socrates, de Mens. 68 ; Artemid. Epit
. p. 63. ) Clemens of
whom Xenophon represents as rebuking him, after Alexandria (Strom. i. p. 141) mentions an Euthy-
his peculiar fashion, for imagining himself to know menes as the author of Xpovine, but whether they
more than he did. (Plat. Conv. p. 222 ; Xen. Mem. are the same or different persons, cannot be deter-
i. 2. & 29, iv. 2. )
mined.
[L. S. ]
4. A man of Sicyon, who made himself tyrant EUTHYME'DES, a Greek painter of some
of the city, together with Timocleidas. On their note, whose time is unknown. (Plin. xxxv. 11.
deposition, according to Pausanias, the supreme s. 40. § 42. )
[P. S. ]
power was committed to Cleinias, the father of EUTHY'MIDAS, a leading man at Chalcis in
Aratus. (CLEINIAS, No. 5. ]
Euboea, was driven out of his native city by the
5. A writer on cookery, referred to by Athe- Roman party, and made an unsuccessful attempt
naeus, who quotes certain verses of his on salted in B. c. 192 to bring it under the power of the
fish, set forth by him in joke as a genuine frag- Aetolians. (Liv. xxxv. 37, 38. )
ment of Hesiod.