In the summer we get a few potatoes,
planting
a small patch ourselves;.
Marx - Capital-Volume-I
125
What were the consequences for the Irish labourers left behind and freed from the surplus population? That the relative surplus population is today as great as before 1846; that wages are just as low, that the oppression of the labourers has increased, that misery is forcing the country towards a new crisis. The facts are simple. The revolution in agriculture has kept pace with emigration. The production of relative surplus population has more than kept pace with the absolute depopulation. A glance at table C. shows that the change of arable to pasture land must work yet more acutely in Ireland than in England. In England the cultivation of green crops increases with the breeding of cattle; in Ireland, it decreases. Whilst a large number of acres, that were formerly tilled, lie idle or are turned permanently into grass-land, a great part of the waste land and peat bogs that were unused formerly, become of service for the extension of cattle- breeding. The smaller and medium farmers - I reckon among these all who do not cultivate more than 100 acres - still make up about 8/10ths of the whole number. 126 They are one after the other, and with a degree of force unknown before, crushed by the competition of an agriculture managed by capital, and therefore they continually furnish new recruits to the class of wage labourers. The one great industry of Ireland, linen-manufacture, requires relatively few adult men and only employs altogether, in spite of its expansion since the price of cotton rose in 1861-1866,
? 481 Chapter 25
a comparatively insignificant part of the population. Like all other great modern industries, it constantly produces, by incessant fluctuations, a relative surplus population within its own sphere, even with an absolute increase in the mass of human beings absorbed by it. The misery of the agricultural population forms the pedestal for gigantic shirt-factories, whose armies of labourers are, for the most part, scattered over the country. Here, we encounter again the system described above of domestic industry, which in underpayment and overwork, possesses its own systematic means for creating supernumerary labourers. Finally, although the depopulation has not such destructive consequences as would result in a country with fully developed capitalistic production, it does not go on without constant reaction upon the home-market. The gap which emigration causes here, limits not only the local demand for labour, but also the incomes of small shopkeepers, artisans, tradespeople generally. Hence the diminution in incomes between ? 60 and ? 100 in Table E.
A clear statement of the condition of the agricultural labourers in Ireland is to be found in the Reports of the Irish Poor Law Inspectors (1870). 127Officials of a government which is maintained only by bayonets and by a state of siege, now open, now disguised, they have to observe all the precautions of language that their colleagues in England disdain. In spite of this, however, they do not let their government cradle itself in illusions. According to them the rate of wages in the country, still very low, has within the last 20 years risen 50-60 per cent. , and stands now, on the average, at 6s. to 9s. per week. But behind this apparent rise, is hidden an actual fall in wages, for it does not correspond at all to the rise in price of the necessary means of subsistence that has taken place in the meantime. For proof, the following extract from the official accounts of an Irish workhouse.
The price of the necessary means of subsistence is therefore fully twice, and that of clothing exactly twice, as much as they were 20 years before.
Even apart from this disproportion, the mere comparison of the rate of wages expressed in gold would give a result far from accurate. Before the famine, the great mass of agricultural wages were paid in kind, only the smallest part in money; today, payment in money is the rule. From this it follows that, whatever the amount of the real wage, its money rate must rise.
--Previous to the famine, the labourer enjoyed his cabin . . . with a rood, or half-acre or acre of land, and facilities for . . . a crop of potatoes. He was able to rear his pig and keep fowl. . . . But they now have to buy bread, and they have no refuse upon which they can feed a pig or fowl, and they have consequently no benefit from the sale of a pig, fowl, or eggs. ? 128
In fact, formerly, the agricultural labourers were but the smallest of the small farmers, and formed for the most part a kind of rear-guard of the medium and large farms on which they found employment. Only since the catastrophe of 1846 have they begun to form a fraction of the class of purely wage labourers, a special class, connected with its wage-masters only by monetary relations.
We know what were the conditions of their dwellings in 1846. Since then they have grown yet worse. A part of the agricultural labourers, which, however, grows less day by day, dwells still on
? ? ? AVERAGE WEEKLY COST PER HEAD
? ? Year ended
? ? ? ? Provisions and Necessaries.
? ? ? ? ? ? ? Clothing.
? ? ? TOTAL.
? ? 29th Sept. , 1849.
? ? ? ? 1s. 3 1/4d.
? ? ? ? ? 3d.
? ? ? ? 1s. 6 1/4d.
? ? ? 29th Sept. , 1869.
? ? 2s. 7 1/4d.
? ? ? ? ? 6d.
? ? 3s. 1 1/4d.
? ? 482 Chapter 25
the holdings of the farmers in over-crowded huts, whose hideousness far surpasses the worst that the English agricultural labourers offered us in this way. And this holds generally with the exception of certain tracts of Ulster; in the south, in the counties of Cork, Limerick, Kilkenny, &c. ; in the east, in Wicklow, Wexford, &c. ; in the centre of Ireland, in King's and Queen's County,, Dublin, &c. ; in the west, in Sligo, Roscommon, Mayo, Galway, &c.
--The agricultural labourers' huts,? an inspector cries out, --are a disgrace to the Christianity and to the civilisation of this country. ? 129
In order to increase the attractions of these holes for the labourers, the pieces of land belonging thereto from time immemorial, are systematically confiscated.
--The mere sense that they exist subject to this species of ban, on the part of the landlords and their agents, has . . . given birth in the minds of the labourers to corresponding sentiments of antagonism and dissatisfaction towards those by whom they are thus led to regard themselves as being treated as . . . a proscribed race. ? 130
The first act of the agricultural revolution was to sweep away the huts situated on the field of labour. This was done on the largest scale, and as if in obedience to a command from on high. Thus many labourers were compelled to seek shelter in villages and towns. There they were thrown like refuse into garrets, holes, cellars and comers, in the worst back slums. Thousands of Irish families, who according to the testimony of the English, eaten up as these are with national prejudice, are notable for their rare attachment to the domestic hearth, for their gaiety and the purity of their home-life, found themselves suddenly transplanted into hotbeds of vice. The men are now obliged to seek work of the neighbouring farmers and are only hired by the day, and therefore under the most precarious form of wage. Hence
--they sometimes have long distances to go to and from work, often get wet, and suffer much hardship, not unfrequently ending in sickness, disease and want. ? 131
-- The towns have had to receive from year to year what was deemed to be the surplus labour of the rural division;? 132 and then people still wonder --there is still a surplus of labour in the towns and villages, and either a scarcity or a threatened scarcity in some of the country divisions. ? 133 The truth is that this want only becomes perceptible --in harvest-time, or during spring, or at such times as agricultural operations are carried on with activity; at other periods of the year many hands are idle;? 134 that --from the digging out of the main crop of potatoes in October until the early spring following . . . there is no employment for them;? 135and further, that during the active times they --are subject to broken days and to all kinds of interruptions. ? 136
These results of the agricultural revolution - i. e. , the change of arable into pasture land, the use of machinery, the most rigorous economy of labour, &c. , are still further aggravated by the model landlords, who, instead of spending their rents in other countries, condescend to live in Ireland on their demesnes. In order that the law of supply and demand may not be broken, these gentlemen draw their
--labour-supply . . . chiefly from their small tenants, who are obliged to attend when required to do the landlord's work, at rates of wages, in many instances, considerably under the current rates paid to ordinary labourers, and without regard to the inconvenience or loss to the tenant of being obliged to neglect his own business at critical periods of sowing or reaping. ? 137
? 483 Chapter 25
The uncertainty and irregularity of employment, the constant return and long duration of gluts of labour, all these symptoms of a relative surplus population, figure therefore in the reports of the Poor Law administration, as so many hardships of the agricultural proletariat. It will be remembered that we met, in the English agricultural proletariat, with a similar spectacle. But the difference is that in England, an industrial country, the industrial reserve recruits itself from the country districts, whilst in Ireland, an agricultural country, the agricultural reserve recruits itself from the towns, the cities of refuge of the expelled agricultural, labourers. In the former, the supernumeraries of agriculture are transformed into factory operatives; in the latter, those forced into the towns, whilst at the same time they press on the wages in towns, remain agricultural labourers, and are constantly sent back to the country districts in search of work.
The official inspectors sum up the material condition of the agricultural labourer as follows:
--Though living with the strictest frugality, his own wages are barely sufficient to provide food for an ordinary family and pay his rent? and he depends upon other sources for the means of clothing himself, his wife, and children. . . . The atmosphere of these cabins, combined with the. other privations they are subjected to, has made this class particularly susceptible to low fever and pulmonary consumption. ? 138
After this, it is no wonder that, according to the unanimous testimony of the inspectors, a sombre discontent runs through the ranks of this class, that they long for the return of the past, loathe the present, despair of the future, give themselves up --to the evil influence of agitators,? and have only one fixed idea, to emigrate to America. This is the land of Cockaigne, into which the great Malthusian panacea, depopulation, has transformed green Erin.
What a happy life the Irish factory operative leads one example will show:
--On my recent visit to the North of Ireland,? says the English Factory Inspector, Robert Baker, --I met with the following evidence of effort in an Irish skilled workman to afford education to his children; and I give his evidence verbatim, as I took it from his mouth. That he was a skilled factory hand, may be understood when I say that he was employed on goods for the Manchester market. ? Johnson. - I am a beetler and work from 6 in the morning till 11 at night, from Monday to Friday. Saturday we leave off at 6 p. m. , and get three hours of it (for meals and rest). I have five children in all. For this work I get 10s. 6d. a week,; my wife works here also, and gets 5s. a week. The oldest girl who is 12, minds the house. She is also cook, and all the servant we have. She gets the young ones ready for school. A girl going past the house wakes me at half past five in the morning. My wife gets up and goes along with me. We get nothing (to eat) before we come to work. The child of 12 takes dare of the little children all the day, and we get nothing till breakfast at eight. At eight we go home. We get tea once a week; at other times we get stirabout, sometimes of oat-meal, sometimes of Indian meal, as we are able to get it. In the winter we get a little sugar and water to our Indian meal.
In the summer we get a few potatoes, planting a small patch ourselves;. and when they are done we get back to stirabout. Sometimes we get a little milk as it may be. So we go on from day to day, Sunday and week day, always the same the year round. I am always very much tired when I have done at night. We may see a bit of flesh meat sometimes, but very seldom. Three of our children attend school, for whom we pay 1d. a week a head. Our rent is 9d. a week. Peat for firing costs 1s. 6d. a fortnight at the very lowest. '? 139
Such are Irish wages, such is Irish life!
? 484 Chapter 25
In fact the misery of Ireland is again the topic of the day in England. At the end of 1866 and the beginning of 1867, one of the Irish land magnates, Lord Dufferin, set about its solution in The Times. --Wie menschlich von solch grossem Herrn! ?
From Table E. we saw that, during 1864, of ? 4,368,610 of total profits, three surplus value makers pocketed only ? 262,819; that in 1865, however, out of ? 4,669,979 total profits, the same three virtuosi of --abstinence? pocketed ? 274,528; in 1864, 26 surplus value makers reached to ? 646,377; in 1865, 28 surplus value makers reached to ? 736,448; in 1864, 121 surplus value makers, ? 1,076,912; in 1865, 150 surplus value makers, ? 1,320,906; in 1864, 1,131 surplus value makers ? 2,150,818, nearly half of the total annual profit; in 1865, 1,194 surplus value makers, ? 2,418,833, more than half of the total annual profit. But the lion's share, which an inconceivably small number of land magnates in England, Scotland and Ireland swallow up of the yearly national rental, is so monstrous that the wisdom of the English State does not think fit to afford the same statistical materials about the distribution of rents as about the distribution of profits. Lord Dufferin is one of those land magnates. That rent-rolls and profits can ever be --excessive,? or that their plethora is in any way connected with plethora of the people's misery is, of course, an idea as --disreputable? as --unsound. ? He keeps to facts. The fact is that, as the Irish population diminishes, the Irish rent-rolls swell; that depopulation benefits the landlords, therefore also benefits the soil, and, therefore, the people, that mere accessory of the soil. He declares, therefore, that Ireland is still over-populated, and the stream of emigration still flows too lazily. To be perfectly happy, Ireland must get rid of at least one-third of a million of labouring men. Let no man imagine that this lord, poetic into the bargain, is a physician of the school of Sangrado, who as often as he did not find his patient better, ordered phlebotomy and again phlebotomy, until the patient lost his sickness at the same time as his blood. Lord Dufferin demands a new blood-letting of one-third of a million only, instead of about two millions; in fact, without the getting rid of. these, the millennium in Erin is not to be. The proof is easily given.
? ? ? NUMBER AND EXTENT OF FARMS IN IRELAND IN 1864 140
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No.
? ? ? ? Acres
? ? ? (1) Farms not over 1 acre.
? ? ? ? 48,653
? ? 25,394
? ? (2) Farms over 1, not over 5 acres.
? ? ? ? 82,037
? ? ? ? 288,916
? ? ? (3) Farms over 5, not over 15 acres.
? ? ? ? 176,368
? ? 1,836,310
? ? (4) Farms over 15, not over 30 acres.
? ? ? 136,578
? ? ? 3,051,343
? ? (5) Farms over 30, not over 50 acres.
? ? ? ? 71,961
? ? ? ? 2,906,274
? ? ? (6) Farms over 50, not over 100 acres.
? ? ? ? ? 54,247
? ? ? 3,983,880
? ? ? (7) Farms over 100 acres.
? ? ? ? 31,927
? ? 8,227,807
? ? (8) TOTAL AREA.
? ? ? ? -
? ? ? ? ? 26,319,924
? ? Centralisation has from 1851 to 1861 destroyed principally farms of the first three categories, under 1 and not over 15 acres. These above all must disappear. This gives 307,058
? 485 Chapter 25
--supernumerary? farmers, and reckoning the families the low average of 4 persons, 1,228,232 persons. On the extravagant supposition that, after the agricultural revolution is complete one- fourth of these are again absorbable, there remain for emigration 921,174 persons. Categories 4, 5, 6, of over 15 and not over 100 acres, are, as was known long since in England, too small for capitalistic cultivation of corn, and for sheep-breeding are almost vanishing quantities. On the same supposition as before, therefore, there are further 788,761 persons to emigrate; total, 1,709,532. And as l'appe? tit vient en mangeant, Rentroll's eyes will soon discover that Ireland, with 31/2 millions, is still always miserable, and miserable because she is overpopulated. Therefore her depopulation must go yet further, that thus she may fulfil her true destiny, that of an English sheep-walk and cattle-pasture. ? 141
Like all good things in this bad world, this profitable method has its drawbacks. With the accumulation of rents in Ireland, the accumulation of the Irish in America keeps pace. The Irishman, banished by sheep and ox, re-appears on the other side of the ocean as a Fenian, and face to face with the old queen of the seas rises, threatening and more threatening, the young giant Republic:
Acerba fata Romanos agunt Scelusque fraternae necis.
[A cruel fate torments the Romans, and the crime of fratricide]
1 Karl Marx, l. c. , --A e? galite? d'oppression des masses, plus un pays a de prole? taires et plus il est riche. ? (Colins, --L'Economie Politique. Source des Re? volutions et des Utopies, pre? tendues Socialistes. ? Paris, 1857, t. III. , p. 331. ) Our --prole? tarian? is economically none other than the wage labourer, who produces and increases capital, and is thrown out on the streets, as soon as he is superfluous for the needs of aggrandisement of --Monsieur capital,? as Pecqueur calls this person. --The sickly proletarian of the primitive forest,? is a pretty Roscherian fancy. The primitive forester is owner of the primitive forest, and uses the primitive forest as his property with the freedom of an orang-outang. He is not, therefore, a proletarian. This would only be the case, if the primitive forest exploited him, instead of being exploited by him. As far as his health is concerned, such a man would well bear comparison, not only with the modern proletarian, but also with the syphilitic and scrofulous upper classes. But, no doubt, Herr Wilhelm Roscher, by --primitive forest? means his native heath of Lu? neburg.
2 John Bellers, l. c. , p. 2.
What were the consequences for the Irish labourers left behind and freed from the surplus population? That the relative surplus population is today as great as before 1846; that wages are just as low, that the oppression of the labourers has increased, that misery is forcing the country towards a new crisis. The facts are simple. The revolution in agriculture has kept pace with emigration. The production of relative surplus population has more than kept pace with the absolute depopulation. A glance at table C. shows that the change of arable to pasture land must work yet more acutely in Ireland than in England. In England the cultivation of green crops increases with the breeding of cattle; in Ireland, it decreases. Whilst a large number of acres, that were formerly tilled, lie idle or are turned permanently into grass-land, a great part of the waste land and peat bogs that were unused formerly, become of service for the extension of cattle- breeding. The smaller and medium farmers - I reckon among these all who do not cultivate more than 100 acres - still make up about 8/10ths of the whole number. 126 They are one after the other, and with a degree of force unknown before, crushed by the competition of an agriculture managed by capital, and therefore they continually furnish new recruits to the class of wage labourers. The one great industry of Ireland, linen-manufacture, requires relatively few adult men and only employs altogether, in spite of its expansion since the price of cotton rose in 1861-1866,
? 481 Chapter 25
a comparatively insignificant part of the population. Like all other great modern industries, it constantly produces, by incessant fluctuations, a relative surplus population within its own sphere, even with an absolute increase in the mass of human beings absorbed by it. The misery of the agricultural population forms the pedestal for gigantic shirt-factories, whose armies of labourers are, for the most part, scattered over the country. Here, we encounter again the system described above of domestic industry, which in underpayment and overwork, possesses its own systematic means for creating supernumerary labourers. Finally, although the depopulation has not such destructive consequences as would result in a country with fully developed capitalistic production, it does not go on without constant reaction upon the home-market. The gap which emigration causes here, limits not only the local demand for labour, but also the incomes of small shopkeepers, artisans, tradespeople generally. Hence the diminution in incomes between ? 60 and ? 100 in Table E.
A clear statement of the condition of the agricultural labourers in Ireland is to be found in the Reports of the Irish Poor Law Inspectors (1870). 127Officials of a government which is maintained only by bayonets and by a state of siege, now open, now disguised, they have to observe all the precautions of language that their colleagues in England disdain. In spite of this, however, they do not let their government cradle itself in illusions. According to them the rate of wages in the country, still very low, has within the last 20 years risen 50-60 per cent. , and stands now, on the average, at 6s. to 9s. per week. But behind this apparent rise, is hidden an actual fall in wages, for it does not correspond at all to the rise in price of the necessary means of subsistence that has taken place in the meantime. For proof, the following extract from the official accounts of an Irish workhouse.
The price of the necessary means of subsistence is therefore fully twice, and that of clothing exactly twice, as much as they were 20 years before.
Even apart from this disproportion, the mere comparison of the rate of wages expressed in gold would give a result far from accurate. Before the famine, the great mass of agricultural wages were paid in kind, only the smallest part in money; today, payment in money is the rule. From this it follows that, whatever the amount of the real wage, its money rate must rise.
--Previous to the famine, the labourer enjoyed his cabin . . . with a rood, or half-acre or acre of land, and facilities for . . . a crop of potatoes. He was able to rear his pig and keep fowl. . . . But they now have to buy bread, and they have no refuse upon which they can feed a pig or fowl, and they have consequently no benefit from the sale of a pig, fowl, or eggs. ? 128
In fact, formerly, the agricultural labourers were but the smallest of the small farmers, and formed for the most part a kind of rear-guard of the medium and large farms on which they found employment. Only since the catastrophe of 1846 have they begun to form a fraction of the class of purely wage labourers, a special class, connected with its wage-masters only by monetary relations.
We know what were the conditions of their dwellings in 1846. Since then they have grown yet worse. A part of the agricultural labourers, which, however, grows less day by day, dwells still on
? ? ? AVERAGE WEEKLY COST PER HEAD
? ? Year ended
? ? ? ? Provisions and Necessaries.
? ? ? ? ? ? ? Clothing.
? ? ? TOTAL.
? ? 29th Sept. , 1849.
? ? ? ? 1s. 3 1/4d.
? ? ? ? ? 3d.
? ? ? ? 1s. 6 1/4d.
? ? ? 29th Sept. , 1869.
? ? 2s. 7 1/4d.
? ? ? ? ? 6d.
? ? 3s. 1 1/4d.
? ? 482 Chapter 25
the holdings of the farmers in over-crowded huts, whose hideousness far surpasses the worst that the English agricultural labourers offered us in this way. And this holds generally with the exception of certain tracts of Ulster; in the south, in the counties of Cork, Limerick, Kilkenny, &c. ; in the east, in Wicklow, Wexford, &c. ; in the centre of Ireland, in King's and Queen's County,, Dublin, &c. ; in the west, in Sligo, Roscommon, Mayo, Galway, &c.
--The agricultural labourers' huts,? an inspector cries out, --are a disgrace to the Christianity and to the civilisation of this country. ? 129
In order to increase the attractions of these holes for the labourers, the pieces of land belonging thereto from time immemorial, are systematically confiscated.
--The mere sense that they exist subject to this species of ban, on the part of the landlords and their agents, has . . . given birth in the minds of the labourers to corresponding sentiments of antagonism and dissatisfaction towards those by whom they are thus led to regard themselves as being treated as . . . a proscribed race. ? 130
The first act of the agricultural revolution was to sweep away the huts situated on the field of labour. This was done on the largest scale, and as if in obedience to a command from on high. Thus many labourers were compelled to seek shelter in villages and towns. There they were thrown like refuse into garrets, holes, cellars and comers, in the worst back slums. Thousands of Irish families, who according to the testimony of the English, eaten up as these are with national prejudice, are notable for their rare attachment to the domestic hearth, for their gaiety and the purity of their home-life, found themselves suddenly transplanted into hotbeds of vice. The men are now obliged to seek work of the neighbouring farmers and are only hired by the day, and therefore under the most precarious form of wage. Hence
--they sometimes have long distances to go to and from work, often get wet, and suffer much hardship, not unfrequently ending in sickness, disease and want. ? 131
-- The towns have had to receive from year to year what was deemed to be the surplus labour of the rural division;? 132 and then people still wonder --there is still a surplus of labour in the towns and villages, and either a scarcity or a threatened scarcity in some of the country divisions. ? 133 The truth is that this want only becomes perceptible --in harvest-time, or during spring, or at such times as agricultural operations are carried on with activity; at other periods of the year many hands are idle;? 134 that --from the digging out of the main crop of potatoes in October until the early spring following . . . there is no employment for them;? 135and further, that during the active times they --are subject to broken days and to all kinds of interruptions. ? 136
These results of the agricultural revolution - i. e. , the change of arable into pasture land, the use of machinery, the most rigorous economy of labour, &c. , are still further aggravated by the model landlords, who, instead of spending their rents in other countries, condescend to live in Ireland on their demesnes. In order that the law of supply and demand may not be broken, these gentlemen draw their
--labour-supply . . . chiefly from their small tenants, who are obliged to attend when required to do the landlord's work, at rates of wages, in many instances, considerably under the current rates paid to ordinary labourers, and without regard to the inconvenience or loss to the tenant of being obliged to neglect his own business at critical periods of sowing or reaping. ? 137
? 483 Chapter 25
The uncertainty and irregularity of employment, the constant return and long duration of gluts of labour, all these symptoms of a relative surplus population, figure therefore in the reports of the Poor Law administration, as so many hardships of the agricultural proletariat. It will be remembered that we met, in the English agricultural proletariat, with a similar spectacle. But the difference is that in England, an industrial country, the industrial reserve recruits itself from the country districts, whilst in Ireland, an agricultural country, the agricultural reserve recruits itself from the towns, the cities of refuge of the expelled agricultural, labourers. In the former, the supernumeraries of agriculture are transformed into factory operatives; in the latter, those forced into the towns, whilst at the same time they press on the wages in towns, remain agricultural labourers, and are constantly sent back to the country districts in search of work.
The official inspectors sum up the material condition of the agricultural labourer as follows:
--Though living with the strictest frugality, his own wages are barely sufficient to provide food for an ordinary family and pay his rent? and he depends upon other sources for the means of clothing himself, his wife, and children. . . . The atmosphere of these cabins, combined with the. other privations they are subjected to, has made this class particularly susceptible to low fever and pulmonary consumption. ? 138
After this, it is no wonder that, according to the unanimous testimony of the inspectors, a sombre discontent runs through the ranks of this class, that they long for the return of the past, loathe the present, despair of the future, give themselves up --to the evil influence of agitators,? and have only one fixed idea, to emigrate to America. This is the land of Cockaigne, into which the great Malthusian panacea, depopulation, has transformed green Erin.
What a happy life the Irish factory operative leads one example will show:
--On my recent visit to the North of Ireland,? says the English Factory Inspector, Robert Baker, --I met with the following evidence of effort in an Irish skilled workman to afford education to his children; and I give his evidence verbatim, as I took it from his mouth. That he was a skilled factory hand, may be understood when I say that he was employed on goods for the Manchester market. ? Johnson. - I am a beetler and work from 6 in the morning till 11 at night, from Monday to Friday. Saturday we leave off at 6 p. m. , and get three hours of it (for meals and rest). I have five children in all. For this work I get 10s. 6d. a week,; my wife works here also, and gets 5s. a week. The oldest girl who is 12, minds the house. She is also cook, and all the servant we have. She gets the young ones ready for school. A girl going past the house wakes me at half past five in the morning. My wife gets up and goes along with me. We get nothing (to eat) before we come to work. The child of 12 takes dare of the little children all the day, and we get nothing till breakfast at eight. At eight we go home. We get tea once a week; at other times we get stirabout, sometimes of oat-meal, sometimes of Indian meal, as we are able to get it. In the winter we get a little sugar and water to our Indian meal.
In the summer we get a few potatoes, planting a small patch ourselves;. and when they are done we get back to stirabout. Sometimes we get a little milk as it may be. So we go on from day to day, Sunday and week day, always the same the year round. I am always very much tired when I have done at night. We may see a bit of flesh meat sometimes, but very seldom. Three of our children attend school, for whom we pay 1d. a week a head. Our rent is 9d. a week. Peat for firing costs 1s. 6d. a fortnight at the very lowest. '? 139
Such are Irish wages, such is Irish life!
? 484 Chapter 25
In fact the misery of Ireland is again the topic of the day in England. At the end of 1866 and the beginning of 1867, one of the Irish land magnates, Lord Dufferin, set about its solution in The Times. --Wie menschlich von solch grossem Herrn! ?
From Table E. we saw that, during 1864, of ? 4,368,610 of total profits, three surplus value makers pocketed only ? 262,819; that in 1865, however, out of ? 4,669,979 total profits, the same three virtuosi of --abstinence? pocketed ? 274,528; in 1864, 26 surplus value makers reached to ? 646,377; in 1865, 28 surplus value makers reached to ? 736,448; in 1864, 121 surplus value makers, ? 1,076,912; in 1865, 150 surplus value makers, ? 1,320,906; in 1864, 1,131 surplus value makers ? 2,150,818, nearly half of the total annual profit; in 1865, 1,194 surplus value makers, ? 2,418,833, more than half of the total annual profit. But the lion's share, which an inconceivably small number of land magnates in England, Scotland and Ireland swallow up of the yearly national rental, is so monstrous that the wisdom of the English State does not think fit to afford the same statistical materials about the distribution of rents as about the distribution of profits. Lord Dufferin is one of those land magnates. That rent-rolls and profits can ever be --excessive,? or that their plethora is in any way connected with plethora of the people's misery is, of course, an idea as --disreputable? as --unsound. ? He keeps to facts. The fact is that, as the Irish population diminishes, the Irish rent-rolls swell; that depopulation benefits the landlords, therefore also benefits the soil, and, therefore, the people, that mere accessory of the soil. He declares, therefore, that Ireland is still over-populated, and the stream of emigration still flows too lazily. To be perfectly happy, Ireland must get rid of at least one-third of a million of labouring men. Let no man imagine that this lord, poetic into the bargain, is a physician of the school of Sangrado, who as often as he did not find his patient better, ordered phlebotomy and again phlebotomy, until the patient lost his sickness at the same time as his blood. Lord Dufferin demands a new blood-letting of one-third of a million only, instead of about two millions; in fact, without the getting rid of. these, the millennium in Erin is not to be. The proof is easily given.
? ? ? NUMBER AND EXTENT OF FARMS IN IRELAND IN 1864 140
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No.
? ? ? ? Acres
? ? ? (1) Farms not over 1 acre.
? ? ? ? 48,653
? ? 25,394
? ? (2) Farms over 1, not over 5 acres.
? ? ? ? 82,037
? ? ? ? 288,916
? ? ? (3) Farms over 5, not over 15 acres.
? ? ? ? 176,368
? ? 1,836,310
? ? (4) Farms over 15, not over 30 acres.
? ? ? 136,578
? ? ? 3,051,343
? ? (5) Farms over 30, not over 50 acres.
? ? ? ? 71,961
? ? ? ? 2,906,274
? ? ? (6) Farms over 50, not over 100 acres.
? ? ? ? ? 54,247
? ? ? 3,983,880
? ? ? (7) Farms over 100 acres.
? ? ? ? 31,927
? ? 8,227,807
? ? (8) TOTAL AREA.
? ? ? ? -
? ? ? ? ? 26,319,924
? ? Centralisation has from 1851 to 1861 destroyed principally farms of the first three categories, under 1 and not over 15 acres. These above all must disappear. This gives 307,058
? 485 Chapter 25
--supernumerary? farmers, and reckoning the families the low average of 4 persons, 1,228,232 persons. On the extravagant supposition that, after the agricultural revolution is complete one- fourth of these are again absorbable, there remain for emigration 921,174 persons. Categories 4, 5, 6, of over 15 and not over 100 acres, are, as was known long since in England, too small for capitalistic cultivation of corn, and for sheep-breeding are almost vanishing quantities. On the same supposition as before, therefore, there are further 788,761 persons to emigrate; total, 1,709,532. And as l'appe? tit vient en mangeant, Rentroll's eyes will soon discover that Ireland, with 31/2 millions, is still always miserable, and miserable because she is overpopulated. Therefore her depopulation must go yet further, that thus she may fulfil her true destiny, that of an English sheep-walk and cattle-pasture. ? 141
Like all good things in this bad world, this profitable method has its drawbacks. With the accumulation of rents in Ireland, the accumulation of the Irish in America keeps pace. The Irishman, banished by sheep and ox, re-appears on the other side of the ocean as a Fenian, and face to face with the old queen of the seas rises, threatening and more threatening, the young giant Republic:
Acerba fata Romanos agunt Scelusque fraternae necis.
[A cruel fate torments the Romans, and the crime of fratricide]
1 Karl Marx, l. c. , --A e? galite? d'oppression des masses, plus un pays a de prole? taires et plus il est riche. ? (Colins, --L'Economie Politique. Source des Re? volutions et des Utopies, pre? tendues Socialistes. ? Paris, 1857, t. III. , p. 331. ) Our --prole? tarian? is economically none other than the wage labourer, who produces and increases capital, and is thrown out on the streets, as soon as he is superfluous for the needs of aggrandisement of --Monsieur capital,? as Pecqueur calls this person. --The sickly proletarian of the primitive forest,? is a pretty Roscherian fancy. The primitive forester is owner of the primitive forest, and uses the primitive forest as his property with the freedom of an orang-outang. He is not, therefore, a proletarian. This would only be the case, if the primitive forest exploited him, instead of being exploited by him. As far as his health is concerned, such a man would well bear comparison, not only with the modern proletarian, but also with the syphilitic and scrofulous upper classes. But, no doubt, Herr Wilhelm Roscher, by --primitive forest? means his native heath of Lu? neburg.
2 John Bellers, l. c. , p. 2.
