No More Learning

There is a little of the familiar frolicking at the
outset; but Martin very soon puts off his cap and bells and sits
down to a solemn confutation of Cooper's new defence of the civil
authority of bishops. After about fifty pages, he recovers
himself, and, with a whoop of 'Whau, whau, but where have I bin
al this while! ” he launches out into ridicule of various passages
in the bishop's apologetic, rounding contemptuously on him for
his deficiency in humour— Are you not able to discern between a
pleasant frump given you by a councellor and a spech used in
good earnest? '
Martin Junior or Theses Martinianae, the next in the series,
exhibits a change in method. Field's notes, which Martin had
merely decorated with his drolleries, had formed the basis of The
Epistle, while the apologetics of Bridges and Cooper had given
substance and cohesion to the sallies of The Epitome and Hay
any worke. In Martin Junior, our pamphleteer aims, for the first
time, at what may be called literary form! . In a period when
fiction, apart from drama, was in its earliest infancy, any piece
of imaginative prose, however rudimentary, is interesting. The
bulk of the tract, indeed, consists of a 'speech' by Martin Marpre-
late and a hundred and ten theses against the bishops, in which
the familiar discipline' arguments are reasserted; but it is
prefaced with a short epistle, ostensibly by Martin Junior, younger
son of the old Martin, and concludes with a lengthy epilogue in
the approved Tarleton style, dedicated "To the worshipfull his very
good neame maister John Canterburie,' and signed 'your worship’s
nephew Martin Junior. In this epilogue, we are given to under-
stand that old Martin has disappeared, possibly into the Gate
House”, and that his son, a 'prety stripling' Martin Junior, has
discovered under a hedge a manuscript containing the aforesaid
theses in his father's handwriting. It will be remembered that
it was precisely in this fashion that part of Martin Junior actually
1 See addenda.
? Possibly this is an allusion to the departure of Waldegrave.
2
2
25-2


## p. 388 (#410) ############################################

388
The Marprelate Controversy
came into the hands of the printer; so it is just possible that
there is more in the tale than appears upon the surface. This
manuscript, which breaks off in the middle of a sentence, Martin
Junior gives to the world, adding a long defence of his father's
methods, obviously addressed to the puritans, whose ‘misliking'
had been the cause of Waldegrave's defection. The imaginative
setting of the Theses Martinianae is continued in Martin Senior
or The just censure and reproofe, which came forth a week later.
Martin Senior is the eldest son of 'Martin the Great' and is,
seemingly, very indignant at his stripling brother's rashness and
impertinence in printing his father's theses. After a little intro-
ductory playfulness in this vein, the tract goes on to give 'an
oration of John Canturburie to the pursuivants when he directeth
his warrants to them to post after Martin,' which is reminiscent of
A Commission sente to the Pope and, at the same time, anticipates
the method of the Satyre Ménippée. In addition to this, we have
'eleven points, with a solemn diatribe, against episcopacy, a
reference to the 'slackness of the Puritans,' a proposal to present
a petition to the queen and privy council, and, lastly, an answer
to the anti-Martinist rimes in Mar-Martine, doggerel for doggerel.
At this juncture, the bishops succeeded, at last, in silencing
their voluble antagonist by seizing his press and arresting his
printers at Manchester. Martin died with defiance on his lips.
His last tract, The Protestation, plunges at once into the question
of the late capture, declares that it can do Martin no harm as
the printers do not know him and proceeds to rail against the
bishops as inquisitors and butchers. It is noticeable that Martin
has almost entirely dropped his comic tone; and, as if he realised
that the time for such a tone had passed, he emphatically declares
'that reformation cannot well come to our church without blood'-a
phrase which, while it ostensibly refers to the blood of the martyrs,
leaves it open for the reader to understand the blood of the
bishops. He bids his readers believe 'that by the grace of God the
last yeare of “Martinisme”. . . shall not be till full two years after
the last year of Lambethisme,' a prophecy which received a
curious fulfilment in the appearance of a pamphlet in imitation of
Martin a year after Laud's execution. The climax of the whole
tract is reached in the 'protestation,' or challenge, to the bishops
to hold a public disputation upon the points of disagreement
between puritan and prelate, its author proclaiming his readiness
to come forward as the public champion of the puritan cause, for
which, should he fail, he is willing to forfeit his life.


## p. 389 (#411) ############################################

The Authorship of the Tracts 389
The Protestation is, strictly speaking, the last of the seven
Marprelate tracts that have come down to us. But there is an
eighth, A Dialogue, printed by Waldegrave in the summer of
1589, which, obviously, is Martinist in sympathy and purpose, and
which deserves mention even if it cannot claim a place among
the other seven. In 1643, it is interesting to notice, it was
reprinted under the title of The Character of a Puritan . . . by
Martin Marprelate; so that there was evidently a tradition
which assigned it to our jester-puritan. The style of the whole
is quite unlike Martin's; but it may be that the dialogue form
would put considerable restraint upon his natural exuberance.
This very form suggests that maker of dialogues, John Udall'.
He had spoken the prologue to the Marprelate drama in his
Diotrephes; it would seem fitting, therefore, that the epilogue
should be his also. But, however this may be, the tract, if not
Martin's, is interesting as a proof that there was at least one
puritan who sympathised with his methods. "The Puritanes like
of the matter I have handled but the forme they cannot brooke,'
our tractarian writes in Martin Junior; and it is worthy of notice
that, while he constituted himself the spokesman of puritanism, he
was far from being in touch with its spirit. The 'preachers,' as we
have seen, looked with great disfavour on his levity. Thomas
Cartwright, the leader of the movement, was careful to dissociate
himself at the very outset from any suggestion of sympathy with
him. Richard Greenham, another celebrated puritan and tutor of
the still more celebrated Browne, actually went so far as to preach
against The Epistle in a sermon delivered at St Mary's, Cambridge.
“The tendency of this book is to make sin ridiculous, when it ought
to be made odious'; so ran the text of his condemnation. These
words lay bare the very springs of puritanism and teach us not
only why Martin failed to win puritan support, but, also, why the
whole movement, despite its many obvious excellences, did not
succeed, in the long run, in winning over the most intellectual
forces of the nation. The puritans banished the comic muse from
England. She returned, in 1660, as the handmaid of Silenus.
Before turning to the answers that Martin evoked from the
episcopalians, a few remarks may be hazarded as to the authorship
of the series of pamphlets that bear his name. An attempt has
been made to father them on Henry Barrow, the separatist, whom
the congregationalists regard as one of the founders of their church,
and who, at the time, was lying in the Fleet. The theory is in-
genious, but quite untenable. The Marprelate tracts were the
1 There is, however, nothing else about the tract to suggest Udall's authorship.


## p. 390 (#412) ############################################

390
The Marprelate Controversy
.
product of the presbyterian, and not of the independent, or
separatist, movement. Udall, Field, Waldegrave, all who were
known to have been connected with the production of the tracts,
were 'church discipline' men, who wished to reform the church
from within. True, Penry joined the separatists in 1592, but, by
that time, Martin Marprelate was ancient history. Further than
this, it has recently been pointed out that Hay any worke contains
a passage in reference to the question of tithe-taking which could
not possibly have been written by a separatist? In point of fact,
most authorities are now agreed that the choice lies between
Throckmorton and Penry. Possibly, the tracts, which exhibited two-
styles, or, at least, two moods, were the result of their combined
energies. Two critics, with a special knowledge of Penry's writings,
have rejected the theory of his identity with ‘Martin' in the
strongest terms”; but, as they are here obviously alluding to
Martin the humorist, their disclaimer does not really affect the
possibility of Penry's responsibility for the theological passages,
though there is absolutely no evidence involving him even to this
limited extent. On the other hand, there seem to be very strong
reasons, even if they do not amount to actual proof, for assigning
at least the comic portions of the tracts to Job Throckmorton. In
1589, Waldegrave had printed a tract entitled M. Some laid open
in his coulers, which, almost without doubt, is Throckmorton's,
though the signature I. G. at the end has led many critics to
attribute it to John Greenwood, Barrow's friend and fellow prisoner
-à theory which, like that ascribing the Marprelate tracts to
Barrow, collapses before the theological test. Dr Some was a
busy controversialist on the Whitgiftian side, and this pamphlet.
against him was one link in another chain of polemical writings,
the particulars of which it is not necessary to examine here.
Suffice it to remark that Some attacked both Penry and Barrow;
and, therefore, it is probable that the author of M. Some laid open,
who had no desire to divulge his identity, intentionally adopted
Greenwood's initials in order to throw dust into the eyes of the
authorities. Style may be a doubtful touchstone for the test of
authorship; but one cannot conceive that anyone familiar with the
tracts of Martin could fail to see the same hand in M. Some laid open.
In every way, it is similar, in that boisterous, rollicking, hustling
i Powicke, Henry Barrow, pp. 82–85, which contain valuable information in
reference to this question of authorship.
2 Waddington, John Penry, and Greive, The Aequity.
3 Sutcliffe's Answere to Job Throckmorton (Arber, Sketch, p. 179). It should be
admitted, however, that not all authorities are inclined to trust Sutcliffe's statements.
to the same extent as the present writer.


## p. 391 (#413) ############################################

The Theological Reply to Martin 391
manner of speech which has won them a place in the literature
of the nation, and it deserves to share that place with them. For
the rest, if further information regarding Throckmorton's real
position in this famous controversy should be needed, there remains
the valuable, if ex parte, testimony of Matthew Sutcliffe.
This man was a protégé of Bancroft and became provost of
his college at Chelsea for the training of theological controver-
sialists. In 1592, appeared an interesting little tractate, under
the title of A Petition directed to her most excellent Majestie,
dealing with the legal aspect of the controversy between the
bishops and the puritans, dwelling, at considerable length, on
Udall's trial in 1590 and, incidentally, clearing Martin of certain
charges of conspiracy and high treason which Bancroft had levelled
against him. In the course of the argument, the author has
occasion to refer to a publication by Sutcliffe. In December 1592,
Sutcliffe replied in An answere to a certaine libel supplicatorie, in
which he accuses Job Throckmorton of being implicated in the
'making of Martin. ' This, in its turn, called forth an angry, but
scarcely convincing, rejoinder by Throckmorton, which Sutcliffe, in
1595, reprinted with running comments of the most damaging nature
in An Answere unto a certaine calumnious letter published by
M. Job Throkmorton. The value of this book lies in the fact that
Sutcliffe bases his indictment upon evidence which has since been
lost. Wherever it is possible to check them, the facts brought
forward cannot be invalidated; and an attentive reader of the
tract will find it difficult to avoid agreeing with its author that
"Throkmorton was a Principal Agent' in the Marprelate business,
‘and the man that principally deserveth the name of Martin? . '
We must now leave the puritan lines, and, crossing over into
the episcopal camp, discover how the forces of authority met
Martin's fierce bombardment. A close examination of the bishops'
counter-attack will reveal three distinct phases in their tactics,
each involving a different section of their supporters. Martin found
himself opposed, not only by the heavy battalions of theology, but,
also, by the archery of dramatic lampoon and the light cavalry
of literary mercenaries. The theological attack, which need not
long detain us, was undertaken, it will be remembered, by Thomas
Cooper, bishop of Winchester, in his Admonition to the People of
England, published in January 1589, and written as a reply to
Martin's Epistle. The book is of no value from the literary point
of view. It answered Martin's raillery with serious rebuke, and
1 But see Wilson, J. Dover, Martin Marprelate and Shakespeare's Fluellen, 1912,
published since the above was written.
6


## p. 392 (#414) ############################################

392
The Marprelate Controversy
was so lacking in humour as to attempt to refute categorically
every accusation against the bishops to be found in The Epistle.
For all this, Cooper, alone of the controversialists, earned the
approval of Bacon, in his Advertisement touching the Contro-
versies of the Church of England, a short treatise written
about this time on the main points of the ecclesiastical dispute.
Cooper won Bacon's praise because he remembered that a fool
was to be answered, but not by becoming like unto him. ' It
is evident that the directors of the episcopal campaign did not
agree with Bacon and Cooper, for theological argument was soon
laid aside and the methods of defence readjusted to changed
conditions. The only theological contribution to the controversy,
after the Admonition, was the publication, in March 1589, of
A sermon preached at Paules crosse the 9 of Februrarie . . . by
Richard Bancroft D. of Divinitie. This sermon, which was
revised and enlarged before being sent to the press, was an
assertion of the divine right of episcopacy as against recent attacks
upon it, Martin's being especially mentioned. Bancroft, who, later,
was to succeed Whitgift in the primacy, was, at this time, a rising
man in the church and found in the Marprelate controversy an
excellent opportunity of proving his mettle. The energy of the
pursuivants who rode up and down the country to find the
Marprelate press, the vigorous detective measures that were
resorted to for the discovery of Martin's identity and the crowning
triumph in Newton's Lane, Manchester, may all be traced to his
untiring exertions. But more than this may be laid to his charge.
As Whitgift himself tells us, he was the moving spirit in the new
phase into which the controversy now entered? . At his suggestion,
the Bridges-cum-Cooper method was laid aside and certain writers
of the day were retained, possibly at a fee, to serve the episcopal
cause by pouring contempt upon its enemy. The result was a
second series of tracts, none of which are of any great literary
merit, being, for the most part, as Gabriel Harvey described one of
them, 'ale-house and tinkerley stuff,' but which have acquired a
certain amount of importance from the fact that John Lyly and
Thomas Nashe are generally supposed to have been engaged in their
production. The new policy began to take effect in the spring and
summer of 1589, and its first fruits were some verses of very in-
ferior quality and a Latin treatise. The possibility that the famous
1 A Petition directed to her most excellent Majestie, 1592, refers (p. 6) to Bacon's
Advertisement, but describes it as 'not printed. '
Strype, Life of Whitgift, vol. 11, cap. XXIII, p. 387.


## p. 393 (#415) ############################################

The Dramatic and Literary Replies 393
2
ta
Euphuist and his friend were, in part, responsible for these effusions,
alone makes it necessary to record their titles. A rimed lampoon
calling itself A Whip for an Ape, in reference to the fact that
Martin' was a common name for a monkey, appeared in April,
followed, shortly afterwards, by a second, similar, but slightly
inferior in style, under the title Mar-Martine. These clumsy
productions provoked a reply in verse no less clumsy from some
worthy person, with the pseudonym Marre Mar-Martin, who points
out that, while Martin and Mar-Martin are at loggerheads, the
protestant religion is in danger from the papists. The impartial
attitude maintained by this writer has led to the conjecture that
he may be one of the Harvey brothers, but there is no evidence to
support it? Such thin verses, whether impartial or antagonistic,
were not likely, in any way, to affect the Martinist cause ; still
less was the sententious pamphlet Anti-Martinus, signed A. L. ,
and entered at Stationers' Hall, on 3 July 1589, which addresses
itself to the youth of both universities and solemnly ransacks
the stores of antiquity for parallels to, and arguments against,
Martin.
The poverty of invention and execution displayed in this first
period of the anti-Martinist attack may be attributed to the fact
that the bishops' penmen were engaged upon other matters.
There are many indications that the summer of 1589 saw the
appearance of certain anti-Martinist plays upon the English stage.
Unfortunately, none of these have come down to us, probably
because they never found their way into print. We may, however,
learn something of them from various references, chiefly retro-
spective, in the pamphlets issued on both sides? These scattered
hints lead us to infer that Martin had figured upon the London
stage in at least two plays, if not more. In one of them, apparently
a species of coarse morality, he appeared as an ape attempting
to violate the lady Divinity. Another, which was played at the
Theater, seems to have been more in the nature of a stage pageant
than a regular drama. Other plays may have been acted; but the
authorities, finding this public jesting with theological topics un-
seemly, appear to have refused to license any more after September,
and, early in November, put a definite stop to those already
10
高
​r
>
1
1
1 It would appear that Plaine Percevall and Marre Mar-Martin could bardly be by the
same hand, as the latter is expressly inveighed against in the dedication to the former.
? The following are the chief contemporary references to anti-Martinist plays :
Martin Junior, sig. Dii; The Protestation, p. 24; McKerrow's Nashe, vol. 1, pp. 59, 83, 92,
100, 107; vol. in, p. 354; Grosart's Nashe, vol. 1, p. 175, and Harvey, vol. 11, p. 213;
Bond's Lyly, vol. 11, pp. 398, 408; Plaine Percevall (Petheram's reprint, 1860), p. 16.
1


## p. 394 (#416) ############################################

394
The Marprelate Controversy
licensed and any others that may have defied the censor. But the
suppression of the anti-Martinist plays could not banish the topic
from the stage. Martin was the puritan of popular imagination,
and the dramas of the time are full of references to him.
Meantime, there had been a renewed outburst of anti-Martinist
pamphlets, this time in prose. The first of the new series, A
Countercuffe given to Martin Junior, published under the
pseudonym of Pasquill, on or about 8 August, was a direct
answer to Theses Martinianae and, at the same time, served as
a kind of introductory epistle to the tracts that followed, being
but four pages in length. Pasquill announces that he is preparing
two books for publication, The Owles Almanack and The Lives of
the Saints. The latter is to consist of scandalous tales relating to
prominent puritans, to collect which the author has 'posted very
diligently all over the Realme. Whether he ever thus turned
the tables upon Martin, we do not know; but one promise made in
this tract was certainly fulfilled. Before the conclusion, Martin
Junior is warned to expect shortly a commentary upon his
epilogue, with epitaphs for his father's hearse. This refers to
Martins Months Minde, and it is worth noticing that the writer
claims no responsibility for it as he does for the other two.
Martins Months Minde, by far the cleverest and most amusing
of the anti-Martinist tracts, in all probability saw light soon after
A Countercuffe. Its title refers to the old practice of holding a
commemoration service, known as a 'month's mind,' four weeks
after a funeral. The fresh vein of humour opened by Martin in
Theses Martinianae is here further worked out by a writer of
the opposite side. After discussing the various rumours to account
for old Martin's disappearance, the tract proceeds to give 'a true
account' of his death, describing his treatment by the physicians,
his dying speech to his sons, the terrible diseases that led to his
death, his will and, lastly, the revelations of a post-mortem ex-
amination of his corpse. The whole is rounded off by a number of
epitaphs in English and Latin by his friends and acquaintances.
All this is retailed with much humour and a little coarseness, and
is prefaced by two dedicatory epistles, the first of which is ad-
dressed to Pasquine of England and signed Marphoreus”.
The tracts just mentioned do not refer to the capture of
Martin's press or to the printing of The Protestation, and it is
probable, therefore, that they preceded both these events. Pappe
with a Hatchet and The Returne of Pasquill, the two that follow,
1 For the probable origin of these pen-names see Bond's Lyly, vol. 1, p. 55.


## p. 395 (#417) ############################################

6
The Pamphlets of the Harveys 395
were almost finished before The Protestation came into circulation,
each containing, in a postscript, a brief reference to its appearance.
An approximate date is fixed for all three tracts by the postscript
of The Returne, dated “20 Octobris,' in which the author states that
olde Martins Protestation' came into his hands 'yesternight late. '
Of the two anti-Martinist tracts, Pappe with a Hatchet was,
probably, the earlier, since an answer to it by Gabriel Harvey,
which we shall notice later, was concluded before 5 November.
This worthless production is the only hitherto undisputed contribu-
tion by John Lyly to the controversy. It essays to imitate the style
which Martin had adopted; but the frequent ejaculations with
which it is besprinkled do nothing to relieve the tediousness of the
whole. For the rest, it is a compound of sheer nonsense and frank
obscenity and must have disgusted more with the cause it upheld
than it ever converted from Martinism. The Returne of Pasquill
was superior in every way to Lyly's work, but, even so, it cannot
rank very high. Pasquill, returning from abroad, meets Marphoreus
on the Royal Exchange, and they discuss the inexhaustible topic
of Martinism together. A description of a puritan service at
Ashford, Kent, leads us to suppose that the author of A Counter-
cuffe may, indeed, have carried out his intention of posting over
England for news of the Martinists, and we have further references
to the two books containing his experiences already promised.
The tract concludes with a brief reply to The Protestation,
containing, it is interesting to observe, a eulogy on Bancroft.
Two new writers now joined their voices to the general
wrangle, Gabriel Harvey and his brother Richard, and their entry
was the beginning of yet another controversy, to which the poet
Greene contributed just before his death, and which was eventually
fought out over his dead body by Nashe and Gabriel Harvey. A
detailed description of this dispute would carry us too far from the
present subject', and we must here confine our attention to its open-
ing stage, which alone concerns the matter in hand. In order, we
may conjecture, to add a little flavour to the somewhat thankless task
Bancroft had imposed upon him, Lyly, in his Pappe, had deliber-
ately challenged Harvey to enter the Marprelate lists. Harvey at
once took up the gauntlet in his Advertisement to Papp-Hatchet;
but the writing of it seems to have cooled his anger, for it was not
published until 1593, when, in other ways, he had involved himself
in a quarrel with the literary free-lances of London. His pamphlet,
a
when it appeared, was found to be more of a personal attack than
1 Sce bibliograpby.


## p. 396 (#418) ############################################

396
The Marprelate Controversy
a contribution to the general controversy, concerning which it
assumes an air of academic impartiality, dealing out blows to both
parties in that 'crab-tree cudgell style' which we associate with its
author, and displaying as ostentatiously as may be his learning and
wide knowledge of theology. His brother Richard, it may be at
his suggestion, now followed suit, though scarcely with the same
impartial spirit, in A Theologicall Discourse of the Lamb of God
and his enemies, wherein the 'new Barbarisme' of Martin is
shown to be nothing but an old heresy refurbished.
The Theologicall Discourse is mainly interesting for its 'Epistle
to the Reader,' which contained a passage apparently vilifying the
littérateurs of the day under the name of the 'make plajes and make
bates' of London. This roused Greene, in his Quip for an Upstart
Courtier (1592), to retaliate by some comments upon the Harvey
family in general. The poet soon afterwards died; but Gabriel
Harvey's pride had been seriously wounded and he would not
allow the matter to rest there. His reply, heaping contempt and
imputations upon the memory of the dead man, was answered by
Nashe, and the dispute continued with unabated vigour for some
five years, when, at last, a stop was put to it by the authorities.
That Richard Harvey, whose words had led to this fiery quarrel,
should be the same man who had just published Plaine Percevall
the Peace-maker of England, is somewhat hard to credit, but so
we are definitely assured by Nashe! .
After Martins Months
Minde, this is the most readable of the answers to Martin. Its
style is original, shows faint traces of Euphuism, and is embroidered
with homely proverbs and parenthetical anecdotes in the manner
of Sam Weller. Plaine Percevall himself figures as a countryman
of commonsense, an unsophisticated 'man in the street,' who,
amazed at this surpernaturall art of wrangling,' bids all 'be
husht and quiet a Godsname. '
The entry of the Harveys is an indication of the wide-
spread interest taken in the controversy, and certain tracts noted
in the Stationers' register, together with the list of 'hageling and
profane' pamphleteers given in Martin Junior, shows us that
there were many other writers, not necessarily supporting either
side, who felt compelled to record their opinions upon the vexed
topic of the day. The tracts of two only have survived, and both
voice the same desire for peace and quiet that Plaine Percevall
1 McKerrow's Nashe, vol. I, p. 270.
? If we may judge from the pessimistic tone of The Tears of the Muscs, this raging cou-
troversy seems to have exercised the most depressing effect upon the mind of Spenser.


## p. 397 (#419) ############################################

Martin's Literary Influence
397
be
es
her
had expressed. Their titles are A Myrror for Martinists by
one T. T. and A Friendly Admonition to Martin Marprelate
by Leonard Wright; they were entered at Stationers' Hall on
22 December 1589 and 19 January 1590 respectively.
The last shot fired on the Marprelate battlefield was An
Almond for a Parrat which, begun as a reply to The Protestation,
was delayed for some reason and did not appear until the following
spring? . Its literary merits are small, but it is much more closely
reasoned and well-informed than any other anti-Martinist pro-
duction, and its author seems to have been at pains to collect
much information about Penry, whom he declares to be ‘Martin,'
Udall, Wiggington and other famous puritans. Though An Almond
for a Parrat is a companion to Pappe with a Hatchet, written
in the same ejaculatory, swashbuckling style and replete with
similar ribald stories, nevertheless, the attribution of it to Lyly
does not find favour.
The honour of this battle of the books belongs, so far as
literature is concerned, to Martin. The Marprelate tracts are part
of English literature, the answers to them little more than
materials for literary history. None of the pamphlets written to
order on behalf of the bishops were entered at Stationers' Hall-a
fact which seems to imply that, while Whitgift and Aylmer
sanctioned them privately, they were ashamed to authorise them
publicly. Martins Months Minde and Plaine Percevall are
amusing; but the rest are very unprofitable to be read and most
unworthy to be regarded, if we may parody a familiar Euphuism.
The fact that Lyly and Nashe were responsible, in part, for their
production, and the numerous references throwing light upon the
whole controversy which they contain have alone rescued them
from the oblivion into which they would otherwise have fallen.
It is idle to suggest that they did anything to stop Martin's
mouth: his silence was the work of the pursuivants. Doubt-
less, the growth and final triumph of the cause he advocated
did much to secure immortality for the puritan pamphleteer.
The opening years of the Long parliament saw
a revival
of Martinism. Hay any worke was reprinted in 1641 and
A Dialogue in 1643, while, in 1645, four tracts appeared by a
writer calling himself 'Yongue Martin Marpriest. ' Qualities
of style and not peculiarities of doctrine singled out these from
M.
E*
her
ramente
bro
See the concluding words of the epistle dedicatory (McKerrow's Nashe, vol. III,
p. 343) and Penry's reference to it in his Briej Discovery, 1590, sig. A 4 recto.
" See note at end of bibliography.


## p. 398 (#420) ############################################

398
The Marprelate Controversy
among the countless other puritan tracts that the age produced
for the admiration of posterity. Martin's freakish and audacious
personality and his unusual vein of satire were something new
and not easily forgotten. He was the most famous prose satirist
of the Elizabethan period and may rightly be considered as the
humble forerunner of that much greater satirist whose Tale of a
Tub was a brilliant attack upon all forms of religious controversy.
Martin's style exercised an immediate and appreciable influence
upon his contemporaries—a point that has hitherto scarcely been
noticed—for Nashe, at this period, was a young writer whose style
was hardly formed; and, though he afterwards proudly boasted
that the vaine which I have is of my owne begetting and cals no
man father in England but myself", yet it is impossible not to see
that the most modern and most racy prose writer of the Eliza-
bethan age owed a considerable debt to 'olde Martin Makebate,
in contest with whom he won his spurs. The famous Epistolae
Obscurorum Virorum were some seventy years earlier than the
Marprelate tracts and rank much higher as literature. It is not,
however, fair to compare the deliberate creation of some of the
protagonists of German humanism with hasty and ill-digested
attacks upon episcopacy, struck off from a travelling printing press.
Much the same may be said of the Satyre Ménippée, which is fre-
quently quoted as a parallel to its English contemporary. It was a
curious coincidence that remarkable satires should appear in
England and France almost simultaneously, but there was no con-
nection and very little similarity between the two. The Satyre
Ménippée was political in intention, the Marprelate tracts religious.
The group of politiques who were responsible for the French satire
represented the commonsense of France tired of the tyranny or
the League and the long unrest of past years. Their work was an
epitaph on an already fallen foe, and the laugh it elicited was one
of relief and of hope. To Martin, on the other hand, it was given
to be one of the first to blow the trumpet against the episcopal
Jericho which, when at last it fell, involved the monarchy in its
ruins. Few, even of those of his own party, sympathised with
him or understood him, but, when the hour of victory came, some
were found to remember his service in the cause.
1 McKerrow's Nashe, vol. 5 p. 319.


## p. 399 (#421) ############################################

CHAPTER XVIII
OF THE LAWS OF ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY
THE London of the early days of Elizabeth has been described
as a city of ruins. On every side lay the wreck of some religious
house which had perished in the days of the dissolution, and had
not been supplanted by new edifices. This description of the
capital may not inaptly be applied in a wider sense to the con-
dition of England. For more than a generation, the work of
destruction in every department of social and political life had
been in progress; and, in religion, which then completely over-
shadowed all other human interests, the old order had collapsed,
and the signs of its fall were on every side. The work before the
statesmen and divines of the age was emphatically one of recon-
struction, which had to be done in the midst of much turmoil and
distraction, with foes on every side ready to criticise, to deride
and, if possible, to destroy, whatever was being erected. Perhaps
the most striking and courageous act of the government of
Elizabeth was to face the religious problem, a task on which,
though complete success was impossible and serious failure would
have been disastrous, the fate of the country largely depended.
The destruction of the scholastic system of theology, built up
during the middle ages, left the nations of Europe without a theory
either of government or religion; and the first results of the
reformation had been a series of disastrous experiments in both
spheres. Anabaptism and socinianism alike showed the need for
protestantism to formulate and define its teaching; and the result
was the rise of a new scholasticism. But for this, the entire
reformation must have failed in face of the Catholic revival, which
was rapidly gaining ground throughout Europe ; and it is due to the
genius of Calvin that a strong barrier to its progress was erected.
Calvin showed at Geneva that he possessed in an eminent degree
the power of ruling men and of supplying the moral support
for which they craved. He defined the limits of theological


## p. 400 (#422) ############################################

400
Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity
speculation; by his action in the matter of Servetus, he proclaimed
to the world that he had no sympathy with any attempt to tamper
with the fundamentals of Christianity; whilst his Institutes, as was
truly said, took the place of the Sentences of Peter Lombard as the
groundwork of protestant theology.
But the Genevan church showed itself every whit as masterful
and dogmatic as its Roman rival, and its actions were equally
justified by an appeal to Divine authority. If the papal dogma
rested on the rock of church tradition as defined by the successors
of St Peter, that of Geneva was based on the impregnable rock of
Holy Scripture as interpreted by John Calvin. Both churches
were agreed in demanding unquestioning obedience and in regard-
ing the civil power as simply an instrument to carry out their
decrees. In both, St Augustine's ideal Civitas Dei was to be
made as real a factor in human politics as circumstances would
permit. The nations had practically to choose between two theo-
cracies : the one, venerable with the unbroken tradition of ages;
the other, full of the vigour of youth, the inspiration of genius
and the confidence that the future of humanity lay in its hands.
Elizabeth and her advisers deliberately refused to put England
under either.
What England needed most at the accession of Elizabeth was
time. The nation was as yet unprepared to make its final decision
in the matter of religion; it was exhausted by internal dissensions
and a ruinous foreign policy ; revolution and reckless experiments
had rendered the church almost impotent. Lutheran protestantism,
Genevan protestantism, Zwinglianism and the Catholic reaction
had all been welcomed and found wanting; and the queen was
resolved to have no more experiments. Rome meant Spain and
the inquisition ; Geneva, the repetition of the miseries and dis-
orders of the reign of Edward VI; and the country was in equal
dread of both. Moreover, it was not by any means certain that
the divisions of the western church were yet permanent, or the
breach between Rome and the northern nations irreparable. The
council of Trent had not concluded its sessions and there was
still a hope, albeit a faint one, that the Roman church would so
reform itself that reunion might be possible. The country had not
yet made up its mind between the old religion and the new; and
which side it would adopt time and circumstances alone could show.
Accordingly, with the general approval of the nation, Elizabeth
temporised; and the arrangement she made in ecclesiastical
matters was essentially of the nature of a compromise. The


## p. 401 (#423) ############################################

The Elizabethan Settlement
401
queen and her advisers had the wisdom to recognise the vital
necessity of peace both at home and abroad, to give England time
to recover from the disasters of the last two reigns. To have pre-
cipitated matters would have meant either a foreign or a domestic
war-perhaps both. If peace were to be preserved, it was essential
to persuade Catholic and protestant alike that nothing final had
been done; to allow Philip and Spain to look for the speedy
reconciliation of England to the church without unduly damping
the expectations of the reformers, on whose support Elizabeth
mainly relied. The result was the settlement of 1559, by which
the prayer book and the communion service were restored and
episcopacy and such ancient ceremonies as were not absolutely
incompatible with the new theology retained. No one believed,
perhaps, that the religious policy of Elizabeth possessed any more
elements of permanency than those of her predecessors; and the
nation acquiesced in what had been done in confident expectation
of further developments.
Regarded from the purely political aspect, no legislation could
have been more beneficial in its effects than that of the first
parliament of Elizabeth. It saved England from the tyranny of a
Spanish inquisition and from the horrors of the French wars
of religion. It gave the country nearly ten years' respite from
dangerous religious controversy and enabled it to enter upon a
new era of progress in almost every department of life. Seldom,
if ever, has a religious policy animated by aims so secular as those
of the government of Elizabeth proved so complete a success.
But it could not do more than mitigate the evils it sought to
avoid. It could save England from civil strife, but not from
religious dissension. It was not to be expected that fervent
enthusiasts on either side would be satisfied with what, after all,
was little better than a compromise prompted by the wisdom of
statesmen rather than by the spirituality of earnest seekers after
the kingdom of God. Events, moreover, moved rapidly during
the first years of Elizabeth. It soon became evident that the
breach with Rome was final. The attitude of Paul IV towards
the overtures made by Elizabeth, the rebellion of the northern
earls, the excommunication of the queen by Pius V and the Ridolfi
conspiracy showed that all attempts on the part of the queen's
government to leave a door open for reconciliation had hitherto
failed, as they were destined to do, despite the attempts to
bring about an amicable understanding with Rome which were
continued to the last days of the queen's reign. Abroad, the
26
E. L. III.
CH. XVIII.


## p. 402 (#424) ############################################

402
Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity
a
counter-reformation had begun and soon the massacre of St Bar-
tholomew was to reveal the lengths to which the papal party was
prepared to go. Protestantism had entered upon a struggle for
existence with powerful and able opponents, united to crush it.
and guided with consummate strategy. Against its enemy, the
reformation had forces courageous and resolute enough, but
divided into almost hostile camps. Was, asked many an ardent
reformer in England, his country to stand aside during the great
contest, content with a lukewarm adherence to the new doctrines,
intended to conciliate protestant and papist alike, and capable of
satisfying neither ? Such was the state of affairs when, in 1572,
Mr Strickland, an aged gentleman, introduced a bill for the
further reformation of the church. The queen promptly silenced
interference in church matters in the House of Commons; but,
henceforth, it became evident that a strong puritan party was
coming forward with a well thought out scheme of church govern-
ment in opposition to the Elizabethan settlement.
The life of Calvin reads like one of the romances of ecclesiastical
history. Arriving at Geneva in 1536, in the twenty-fifth year
of his age, the young French priest found the little state just
emerging from the throes of a successful revolution. The Genevans
adapted their constitution, consisting of an ecclesiastical superior, a
lay vicegerent and the commonalty, to the new conditions by making
a board of elders exercise the authority formerly in the hands of
their bishop. The genius and firmness of Calvin caused a great
moral, as well as social, revolution. Expelled by the citizens, who
were exasperated by his severity, he returned in 1541 to carry on
his work with renewed success. Holding at bay the papacy and
the powerful house of Savoy, he raised Geneva to the position of
the capital city of the reformed religion. Its university poured
forth preachers of the new doctrines, men of learning animated
with fiery zeal and undaunted by the fear of martyrdom. The
city became the home of persecuted protestants from all parts
of Europe. Calvin's writings formed the text book of reformed
theology. Nowhere did the English exiles receive a more hospit-
able reception than at Geneva, and it is little to be wondered
that John Calvin was regarded by them with enthusiastic admira-
tion. To these, the godly, orderly and strictly governed Swiss
community was all that a church should be and furnished an ideal
which they longed passionately to realise in their own country.
It is difficult for men in our day, with their preconceived notion of
Calvinism, as represented by its theology, to understand the
a


## p. 403 (#425) ############################################

The Life Work of Calvin 403
extraordinary fascination which the church of Geneva exercised
on the minds of those who had made the city their place of refuge
in the days of persecution, as well as upon those to whom the order,
piety and devotion of the Genevese were known only by hearsay.
Hooker fully recognises this. To him, Calvin, the founder of
the discipline of the church of Geneva, is 'incomparably the wisest
man that ever the French church did enjoy, since the hour it
enjoyed him. ' There is, however, a touch of malice in his next
sentences, characteristic alike of the author and of the profound
scholar's attitude towards the learning of the man of affairs: 'His
bringing up was in the study of the civil law. Divine knowledge
he gathered, not by hearing or reading so much, as by teaching
others. ' Hooker, however, in his preface to Ecclesiastical Polity,
does ample justice to the attractiveness of the Calvinian system,
which the puritan party advocated in their Admonition to Parlia-
ment. When this was first published (1572), the Elizabethan church
system had had thirteen years of trial and had not yet proved
a conspicuous success. At least, it had not united Englishmen in
a single church. The Roman Catholics had left off attendance at
the parish churches ; the Independents had set up congregations ;
and the puritan faction, which had, from the first, regarded the esta-
blished church polity as a temporary expedient, felt justified both
in expressing its grievances and in suggesting a remedy. The
painphlet in which this was done, supposed to be the work of two
ministers, John Field and Thomas Wilcox, styled the Admonition
to Parliament, is a document of singular ability, both in lucidity
of statement and in vigour of language. It sets forth what is called
'a true platforme of a church reformed,' in order that all might
behold the great unlikeness betwixt it and this our English
“
Church. '
The Admonition is brief, well arranged and extremely trench-
ant. After declaring that the notes of a true church are ‘preaching
the word purely, ministering of the sacraments sincerely, and
ecclesiastical discipline which consisteth in admonition and correc-,
tion of faults severlie' it treats of these three points in detail. As
regards the ministry of the word, the writers are of opinion that the
old clergy, 'King Henries priests, king Edward's priests (omitted
2nd ed. ), Queen Maries priests . . . (yf Gods worde were precisely
followed) should . . . be utterly removed. ' Parliament is exhorted to
remove Advowsong, Patronages, Impropriations, and bishoppes' authoritie,
claiming to themselves therby right to ordaine ministers, and to bring in that
old and true election, which was accustomed to be made by the congregation.
a
26-2


## p. 404 (#426) ############################################

404
Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity
a
6
6
"You must,' it goes on to say, 'displace those ignorant and unable ministers
already placed, and, in their rowmes, appoint such as both can, and will, by
God's assistance, feed the flock. . . . Remove homilies, articles, injunctions, a
prescript order of service made out of the masse booke. Take away the Lord.
ship, the loytering, the pompe, the idlenes, and livings of Bishops, but yet
employ them to such ends as they were in the old churche apointed for. Let
a lawful and a godly Seignorie look that they preache, not quarterly or
monthly, but continually: not for filthy lucre's sake but of a ready mynde. '
The paragraph regarding the sacraments contrasts the practice
of the primitive church with that of the time. Of the Lord's
Supper it says :
They took it with conscience, we with custume. They shut out men by
reason of their sinne. . . we thruste them in their sinne to the Lord's
supper.
They ministered the Sacrament plainely. We pompously with singing,
pypying, surplesse and cope wearyng.
The petition was that all irregular baptisms by deacons or
midwives should be 'sharplie punished,' that communicants should
be examined by elders, 'that the statute against waffer cakes
may more prevaile then an Injunction,' that kneeling on reception
of the sacrament should be abolished. But the most important
demand was that, in true conformity with the Calvinian system,
Excommunication be restored to his old former force,' and 'that
papists or other, neither constrainedly nor customably, communi-
cate in the misteries of salvation. '
Discipline, rigorous and impartial, was the chief aim of the
petitioners. The bishops and all their officials must be removed
and complete equality of ministers be established. The whole
regiment of the church is to be placed in the hands of ministers,
seniors and deacons. These are to punish the graver sins, blas-
phemy, usury (2nd ed. 'drunkennesse'), adultery, whoredom, by a
severe sentence of excommunication, uncommutable by any money
payment. In a vigorous apostrophe, parliament is exhorted to
imitate the example of the Scottish and French churches and
thoroughly to root out popery.
'Is,' ask the petitioners, “a reformation good for France? and can it be
evyl for England ? Is discipline meete for Scotland ? and is it unprofitable
for this Realme ? Surely God hath set these examples before your eyes to
encourage you to go forward to a thorow and speedy reformation. Ye may
not do as heretofore you have done, patch and piece, nay, rather, goe back-
ward, and never labour or contend to perfection. But altogether remove whole
Antichrist, both head, bodie and branch, and perfectly plant that puritie of
the word, that simplicitie of the sacraments, that severitie of discipline, which
Christ hath commanded and commended to his church. '
It has been necessary to dwell at some length on the subject
of the Admonition, not only because it is an excellent specimen of


## p. 405 (#427) ############################################

The Puritan Position
405
the eloquence and vigour of prose composition during the early
days of Elizabeth, but, also, because it practically states the whole
case for the demands of the puritans during the period; and it is
practically against these that Hooker is contending throughout his
controversies with Cartwright and Travers. There is, it must with
justice be admitted, much to be said for the puritan demands for
church reform. The abuses of the church courts, owing to the
multiplicity of jurisdictions, were great ; the new clergy, who had
been ordained by the Elizabethan bishops, left much to be desired
in both conduct and capacity ; nor have the denunciations of the
puritans regarding the expense of the cathedral establishments,
the system of patronage and the like lacked the justification of
subsequent experience. But had parliament been allowed to legis-
late as the puritans desired, the result would have been to set up
an ecclesiastical tyranny which, inevitably, would have succeeded in
damping the rising spirit of England, and, almost certainly, would
have provoked a civil war. The puritans, like some other poli-
ticians of our own time, were aiming at an ideal state of society
and were ready to allow the country to run any risk to secure its
establishment. Experience has shown that such an attempt always
demands the sacrifice of personal liberty, and to this, Englishmen,
especially under Elizabeth, were thoroughly averse. With the
possibilities of life ever growing wider, with a country developing
at a rate hitherto unprecedented, with a constantly expanding
horizon of life and thought, England, then, despite her religious
zeal, thoroughly humanistic, was not going to submit to a system
which had only succeeded in a petty municipality like that of
Geneva, and which was being experimentally adopted, with doubtful
benefit to the country, by a nation so barbarous as the Scots were
considered to be in the sixteenth century. Elizabeth understood
her people far better than did parliament when she resolutely
opposed the discussion of the grievances of the puritans.
Richard Hooker entered the lists almost a generation after the
early puritans; and he did so, not so much as a churchman
pleading the cause of ecclesiastical authority, as a representa-
tive of humanistic Christianity and of the love of intellectual
freedom.
The facts of his life can be briefly related from Izaak Walton's
biography—a curious mixture of artless simplicity and consum-
mate art, making the virtues of its subject the more conspicuous
by darkening the background of family life and surroundings.
Born in 1553, at Heavitree, Exeter, Richard Hooker came of


## p. 406 (#428) ############################################

406 Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity
good, though not noble or wealthy, stock, for his uncle John Hooker
was a man of some note and chamberlain of Chichester. By the
influence of this relative, he obtained the patronage of another
Devonian, John Jewel, bishop of Salisbury, and was enabled to
enter Corpus Christi College, Oxford, becoming a fellow of the
society in 1577. Sandys, then bishop of London, made Hooker
tutor to his son Edwin, and he also had charge of George Cranmer,
great nephew of the celebrated archbishop. In 1581, when ap-
pointed to preach at Paul's Cross, Hooker, according to his
biographer, made the fatal mistake of marrying his landlady's
daughter.
666
8
"There is,”' to quote Walton's quaint words, ““ a wheel within a wheel”; a
secret sacred wheel of Providence (most visible in marriages), guided by His
hand that “allows not the race to the swift” norbread to the wise," nor good
wives to good men: and He that can bring good out of evil (for mortals are
blind to this reason) only knows why this blessing was denied to patient Job,
to meek Moses, and to our as meek and patient Mr Hooker. '
In justice to Mrs Hooker, it may be remarked that she and her
family seem to have belonged to the puritan party and, conse-
quently, were extremely obnoxious to the high church friends
of her husband, who seems always to have treated her with respect
and to have named her executrix in his will. In 1584, Hooker
was presented to Drayton Beauchamp in Bucks. , then in the
diocese of Lincoln, and, in 1585, after some dispute, he was
given the mastership of the Temple, where he had his famous
controversy with Walter Travers, the reader, 'a disciplinarian in
his judgment and practice,' who had received only presbyterian
ordination at Antwerp. It was at the Temple that Hooker began to
plan his great work; and, wearied by his contentions with Travers,
whom he admired as a man whilst differing from him as a divine, he
petitioned archbishop Whitgift to relieve him of the mastership
in order that he might study to complete 'a Treatise in which I
intend a justification of the Laws of our Ecclesiastical polity. '
Accordingly, in 1591, Whitgift preferred him to the rectory of
Boscombe, six miles from Salisbury; and, in 1595, queen Elizabeth
gave him the living of Bishopsbourne, three miles from Canterbury.
The first four books of the Polity were completed at Boscombe
and printed in 1594; the fifth appeared in 1597. His health began
to fail in the year 1600, in consequence of a cold contracted on a
journey by water from London to Gravesend ; his will bears date
26 October 1600, and he probably died in the same year. The sixth
and eighth books did not appear till 1648 and 1651, and the


## p. 407 (#429) ############################################

The Preface
407
seventh was first printed in Gauden's edition of Hooker's works
in 1662.
The preface, which, in itself, is as long as the shorter books of
the treatise, is of great importance as a survey of the whole field of
discussion. Hooker begins by declaring to the puritans
I must plainly confess unto yon, that before I examined your sundry
declarations in that behalf, it could not settle in my head to think but that un-
doubtedly such numbers of otherwise right well affected and most religiously
inclined minds had some marvellous reasonable inducements, which led them
with so great earnestness that way.
>
But careful study, as he affirms, only convinced him that the
change which churchmen are required to accept “is only by error
and misconceit named the ordinance of Jesus Christ, no one proof
as yet brought forth whereby it may clearly appear to be so in
very deed.